"The human mind is built to identify for each event a definite cause and can therefore have a hard time accepting the influence of unrelated or random factors. Random processes are fundamental in nature and are ubiquitous in our everyday lives, yet most people do not understand them or think much about them." -- Leonard Iodinos in The Drunkard Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives." Molecules fly randomly through space.
The first part of this quote made me think of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). "He asked if an object can be known to have certain properties prior to the experience of that object. He concluded that all objects about which the mind can think must conform to its manner of thought. Therefore if the mind can think only in terms of causality – which he concluded that it does – then we can know prior to experiencing them that all objects we experience must either be a cause or an effect. However, it follows from this that it is possible that there are objects of such nature which the mind cannot think, and so the principle of causality, for instance, cannot be applied outside of experience: hence we cannot know, for example, whether the world always existed or if it had a cause. And so the grand questions of speculative metaphysics cannot be answered by the human mind, but the sciences are firmly grounded in laws of the mind." Wikipedia
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Rational Thinking versus Belief
"Our world is too complex, potentially too dangerous, for us to base decisions on what we want to believe, rather than what is actually the case. The scientific method is deliberately constructed to oversome the deep-seated human wish to assume that what we want to be true--what we claim to "know"--really is true. In science, emphasis is placed on trying to prove that what you deeply believe to be the case is wrong. Ideas that survive stringent attempts to disprove them are more likely to be correct." - Ian Stewart in The Story of Mathematics:From Babylonian Numbers to Chaos Theory.
Friday, February 5, 2010
"Consider the honeybee....
...gathering nectar from a flower bed. Although simple in appearance, the act is a performance of high virtuosity. The forager was guided to this spot by dances of her nestmates that contained symbolic information about the direction, distance and quality of the nectar source. To reach her destination, she traveled the bee equivalent of hundreds of human miles at bee-equivalent supersonic speed. She has arrived at an hour when the flowers are most likely to be richly productive. Now she closely inspects the willing blossoms by touch and smell and extracts the nectar with intricate movements of her legs and proboscis. Then she flies home in a straight line. All this she accomplishes with a brain the size of a grain of sand and with little or no prior experience."
Opening paragrah from The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance and Strangeness of Insect Societies, Bert Holldubler and Edward O. Wilson, W.W. Norton & Company, 2009.
Opening paragrah from The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance and Strangeness of Insect Societies, Bert Holldubler and Edward O. Wilson, W.W. Norton & Company, 2009.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)